Jump to content
Important Info
  • Register now to gain full access!
  • Full Info about Phoenix: HERE
  • Full Info about Inception: HERE
  • OSGM Competition: HERE
  • Big Guide for Newbies: HERE
  • Hvman

    Members
    • Posts

      128
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      5

    Posts posted by Hvman

    1. 6 minutes ago, ADMIN said:

      This is a common MU S6 bug that always existed, buddy. If it was fixable it was fixed already long time ago. "Think again".

      Maybe it is a "common bug", which i hardly believe so, given that i play s6 for 10 years already and never encountered it, but it's still not the players fault. You could've said "it's a commong bug that we cannot solve, please read the message in game and keep /re on  /re off be4 joining"

      Try to be a bit diplomatic next time. We live to learn and we learn to live.

       

      P.S. If you want your players to know it's unfixable and not get triggered ,maybe take the time to put it in the "unfixable" section.

    2. I had /re auto +password before joining BC , i just didn't have /re auto or /re off, didn't know has to be one of these 2 specifically, cause i always play with /re auto password and never got the screen.

      P.S. It's astonishing that you try to blame me for not having /re auto /re off because you implemented "global npc messages" but you do not say "I didn't fix this bug for 2 patches already". Think again.

      P.S.2. If we speak the truth, a similar bug was on phoenix too, so it has more than 6 months ^_^ (didn't wanna go there till you came and tried to blame me)

    3. 27 minutes ago, Reporter said:

      @Wigle
      I think this community is very different from other communities on other servers, yes some players are upset, they lost, and put a lot of soul and hard work, it's normal for them to react in this way because  pride make them burst (or they just love flames), I'm not trying to find excuses for them, but before to judge them, better try to get to know them, read the interviews taken  from the top players in our community and you will see that they can make you change your opinion about them!
      I personally love this community as it is, what would we do without Chukundah? I love flames (I think because I'm a Reporter) :)) and if you will read his interview u will see that is not a bad guy! 

      There are players of all types and we need each of them (except cheaters ofc) the variety of players brings value to our community.  
      That being said, I welcome you to this crazy and beautiful community.

      I'm sorry you are right.

    4. 6 minutes ago, Wigle said:

      As a newcomer to this server i first got the impression Hardcore were the toxic ones (which many of their stupid players are) and Purge were made up of the "nicer" good players, but now  im not so sure anymore given Purge's comments/actions here and ingame. 
       

      had that feeling too, but i'm losing it on a daily basis.

      @Reporter are you sure Hardcore had -2.5k?

      I'm pretty sure no guild participated in the first CS. And they had 2 consescutive wins till this week so -800 and next week will be -2500.

      I might be wrong, but can you check that?

       

      P.S. Waiting for suggestion on how to clone @GlowaX :))

    5. 3 minutes ago, Snook said:

      Too bad I didn't screenshot when mad people from DIAMONDS told me when we took their spot "We were planning to help you next week, like we did with HC yesterday, but now fuck you" :D

      Anti-game is free of course, that's why noone takes this guild serious anyway. 

      At least they didn't do it that obvious like on 2nd CS where they never entered the room when we were defending.

      Nonetheless, it was a very fun CS and in the end that's what should matter for most, cause it's a game to blow some steam, relax or have a nice time with friends.

      Also, i went offline 5 minute after the CS, but I didn't notice any "cry" from our guild, especially nothing about the bugged stun or when we started the cs really late.

      Can you pm me with some proof that someone from my Guild actually said that, or you just come to throw trash when you lose like you always do?

      Let me tell you this. Strategically-wise, for us, it was better for HARDCORE to win than Purge. But, we did not intentionally help either hardcore nor purge. I specifically told them on discord, try to hold swithces, let's register we need 1 Def and we get the GM Box. I'll rest my case here, since you are apparently a guild of crybabies. Where is the "i'm the best, i do that i do this?". Or the attitude comes with winning, and whining with losing?

      You didn't see notice any "cry"? What about the guy playing on Duke and pmed me 50 lines of "glowa helping hc?"

      Fake people, that do not know how to lose.

      P.S. Helping HC on 2nd CS? We participated in that CS for EXACTLY 25 to 30 minutes. And that's why they won? Cause we(in your mind)helped them? We were on spots by 5:35 P.M. 2 sundays ago WHINER.

    6. 3 hours ago, ADMIN said:

      Hopping in just to "deny" such rumor that especially Glowa "helped" HARDCORE, just because I hate when people always try to find excuses when they lose instead of simply taking the lose and say GG.

      Screen(10_25-18-50)-0006.jpg

      Last 9 minutes a lot of def points up, HARDCORE are attacking, PURGE are defenders, still Glowa is keeping the switch like a maniac, while Diamond tries to register at least one more time.

      Then let's look at total stamper time: 

      Screen(10_25-18-56)-0076.jpg

      Glowa - 1679 seconds.
      1st from PURGE - 1023 seconds.
      1st from HARDCORE - 1108 seconds.

      Mathematically, if Glowa (Diamond) would help HARDCORE then Glowa would not have a single chance to have such stamp time only keeping switch 50% of the time, when HC would be defenders. Because both guilds were defenders 50% of time.

      For realistic people, you have the answer to at least one of the questions, rest are just excuses.

      Congrats to all 3 teams though, impressive fight.

      I have to say. Thank you. We grew tired of people trying to blame everything else but themselves.

    7. Can we actually stop talking about LOL or whatever MOBA game are you discussing in terms of reports like it's comparable to a small-poll of MAYBE 50 chars in the entire server doing IT and try to see if this needs fix or not? I see no point in what you are doing right now.

      If you don't think it needs fix by any means, just close the topic. If you do think it needs some-sort of fix, addition, let's try to reach that on a 50 players pool instead of copying the system of a 100k player pool.

    8. 1 minute ago, Juri said:

      Yea actions like this should be automatic ban for max days possible imho, like if you take a ball, you have it all the time from mid, not died and moved to enemy base. This is obvious anti-play which should have max punishment, despite warn mechanism.

      I know i started the topic, but comming with a cool-head and after some rest and thoughts, i have 2 issues with this opts (ye ye i know it's my own).

      Let's think of what we can to do improve it, like honestly.

      1. Go back to the old system of prints/videos?

      Maybe

      2. Implement a new system? 

      Here comes the real problem. Which one?

      First we/Admin need to come up with an actual implementable idea, which will takes at least 2 weeks, then the Admin needs to actually implement that idea (now, i don't know how easy hard it is) but i will assume it's at least 1 to 2 months, then we need to actually TEST it , so it s not even worse than the actual one, so that s another (let's be optimistic) one week. And we get to 2 more months.

      The easy way around i see, would be a poll made by admin and see what the players actually want. New IT system, OLD IT system, or THIS it system.

      But if the pool is 65% + and ADMIN counts for 20% we wont gonna get a vote on that either.

      I don't like or enjoy this system. It's allowing players to troll and gain advantajes, but for me this is not the biggest issue, the biggest issue is getting TROLL-WARNED, which for this, the rule with (Get 1 warn if you warn) seems decent, but not really. Why? Because  it punishes you when you want to report someone that played bad and you come to a point where you wont be able to WARN someone because you acumulated too many WARNS.

      It's up for debate though, but i don't see a fast fix.

    9. 12 minutes ago, Chukundah said:

      dont understand why u creating a topic about this then to come contradict ur self after

      I said, that the mechanic can be abused, not that it's not a good strategy. I never said i agree with it, i've just said it helps. In my opinion, i'd want it to be fixed somehow (have no idea how can it be fixed though) but being "a good strategy" it s a fact. Where do you see contradiction?

    10. I suggest that when you are hunted and u do /challenge, to replenish your SD 100% when u enter to the colloseum. Atm i'm 90% it doesen't, and i think it should, cause if i go safezone to replenish SD before challenging, i lose the posibility to repel.

    11. I don't think i'm in the right side of the forum, but i'll leave it here open for discussion.

      I used summon while a party mate was in DS and didn't leave the party yet. When i summoned (for someone else) he moved when summon started but he still got summoned out of DS. I think you should make people inside BC/DS unsummonable, also i thought if you move the summon will cancel itself :-?.  (If he has recording on, on anydesk i think we might be able to procure a video of what happened, i'll come back with an edit if we find it).

       

      EDIT: The video recording was not on.

      P.S. I'm not asking for invite back nor entry back. If more players would like this, i'll try to make a suggestion topic.

    12. 2 hours ago, Gion said:

      It is obvious what happened in your case, if you cannot identify this, sorry, but I'm sorry. 😐

      Secondly, I think that Archie's report from March was the trigger moment when we added the translate rule. 

      Soooo, as always, locked.

      Sorry, it's free chat, topic unlocked.

      It is obvious? Teach me, the ways of the obvious, cause i seem to be missing it. 

      At least you unlocked the topic ^_^ i can cry more.

      What about the full-chat rule? Have u added that, 6 months ago too?

    13. So, all started when i got reported for Bad Language and got muted for 12 hours after calling someone "moron" (allegedly).

      I have 2 main issues.

      1. In this post according to your rules, every printscreen should have 15 chatlogs (full chat logs) and he has only 12. There are numerous ocasions in your archive that you decline posts because no 15 chatlogs (i had 1 declined myself) but not Chukunda, or maybe is a personal vendeta (saaad =)))) )

       

      Here Gion is asking for exactly what i'm saying chukundah does not have "15 full chat logs" to take it into consideration.

      2.  We are asked to "translate" posts, which in my opinion is just a nonsense rule, so nonsense that even your mighty gm does not take it into consideration all the time (just when he wants to decline a post or not like someone)

      EX: 

      I won't even start finding even more (in my opinion) missconducts, and i don't expect him to say that he has a problem with me/us and does not judge our post objectivily and the post made against us, since i should've not been muted due to missing chat logs and DEFINETELY not warned.

      Also, the only english word in the post made against me was "moron" which i find also, waaay out of line for a 12 hours mute+warn but that's subjective and i can live with it, it's up to the gm/admin.

      @ADMIN

       

      EDIT: Yes, i do like to cry a lot ❤️

    14. 58 minutes ago, ADMIN said:

      1. It's like saying don't make PvM invasions / events because BK is the worst for them.

      2. It is what was happening on first arena tournament version, and we're trying to reduce such things on this one with different restrictions.

      3. This is what I wrote, that they will be disabled as council suggested.

      4. Last man standing means to remain alive, king of the hill means to score as many points as possible, different objectives.

      5. Buffs are deleted except of personal buffs, so party or not - it's useless.

      If it was possible to have same CC thing it was the easiest solution for previous arena version. It is not possible.

      I don't feel like it's more complicated than previous version. It is just more fair / gives more chances to people.

      I promised that I will bring a new AT version when I removed it, people are asking for it, so I have to deliver.

      Regarding the 5th point. I think being able to create a party, it's still helping, cause we cannot attack our team by mistake (which happens a lot when there are lots of players).

    15. I think it could become a really good tournament for Teamplay. The only downsides are:

      1. Good Team Characters like AE wont benefit from 1v1 potential (since they are considered to be the worst pvp class 1v1 according to forum details)

      2. Solo players will get jumped on by organized teams (i think this is a downside only for the newbies while i think teamplay will make the tournament a lot more funny and entertaining)

      3. Consumables/Scrolls/Potsions could play a big part in making a big difference in terms of power

      4. Is Last Man Standing supposed to just stay allive or have a scoring side (like you kill 5 people, you get x amount of points and u still have chances to qualify?) Cause if not, i feel like the VIT Builds could be abused especially for teamplaying.

      5. Is Party allowed? You do not stipulate if it is or not yet. (also because of point 4, vit/ene bks build could be abused)

      EDIT: Have you thought of an arena tournament regarding teams of 3-5 players maybe? (with the same stats squish-upgrade you brought up.

    16. On 10/9/2020 at 5:57 PM, Deadcat said:

      if it comes as a part of like some Christmas event, then yes, i like this idea.

      I think till christmas we wont need that much of the rudolph.

      A good suggestion to me, rudolph with 255 life sound good.

      @BALR you should put this in the suggestion section, admin can see it easier cause it needs his aproval, and you'll see if it's aproved or not. You can also win some credits if it s aproved i think (not sure)

    17. 1 hour ago, Juri said:

      Honestly don't like it, this will mean that newcomers will have a disadvantage, because they will need to level they alts to move them to higher maps(which will be taken anyway by alts of people who already started) to actually drop jewels, this is the worst thing could be possibly done. Some people already farmed from devias some jewels.

      Next time consider this thing before start of the server - not after.

      Well if you get lvl 250 alts farming the entire devias, people with lvl 50 will never be able to level up so, something needs to be done. 

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.