Hvman

Didn't know that. Ok thank you sir!

As we are already mid-game, i think it should be a good idea to take a look into the PVP aspect of the classes again and try a reballance? Maybe pump a little bit of some chars dmg or so. I know there are chars for PVM or PVP but i guess striving for absolute ballance is not that bad. Thank you in advance.

Gion, i m asking if on the middle row, the blue one, Attack succes rate (which doesen't specify exactly if it s pvp/pvm or both, even though it's known as a pvm row) it's working in both PVM and PVP, not that if PVP trees are working in PVM cause i already test that and they work properly (just in pvp aspects)

If they do not want to be involved, maybe make a pool about changing the limit from 500 to 1000? I'm just suggesting, if it's not approved, it's fine by me.

So, from my experience, in the ML Tree : "Attack Succes Rate" it's PVM only "Attack Rate" it's PVP only Now, i do not know if this is true, and i would like to ask the admins if the first one is working in PVP also. Before you give me the old "you have a test server, go there and test", i did it, and it seemed that ASR is working to PVP also, but could've been just an imagiation (placebo effect cause someone told me before it did). Thank you in advance!

1st. I'd like to suggest to maximize the credit limitation from 500 to 1000. 2nd. I'd like to suggest that u implement a new rule (even though harsh) of not allowing players to sell for more than the max credits allowed on market, comming with harsh punishment. I understand that if @ADMIN starts banning people that are scamming, then he cannot maintain his idea of max 500 credits. The issue is, people have been buying items for 2-3-6-10k credits from the begining of the server, and now realized the can easy "scam" with no punishments and lots of credits are lost for no apparent reason. (Also a lot of mu-players do not join the forum, compare the forum users, to in-game users and or are not reading the rules, which i understand is their fault but can be taken action by you against that). But if u add a NEW rule, against selling for more, i think would be benificial, we are losing players because they got/are getting scammed (i also understand is their own fault but let's try to prevent it somehow). There are all sorts of rules that are preventing stuff for happening in place everywhere and in my opinion this one could be beneficial also for the flow of market and also for the game itself. Maybe make a pool or something?

You enter the server you hear :"squadron, what a great guild" You play 3 weeks you see:" Squadron, stealing 2 accounts, scamming people, disbanding after 2 losses" And here i thought hardcore has issues =))

I guess no one cares, and only the "old players" know/knew about this

Only the 2nd one seems viable, i undestand the HP lag, but i do not understand the MP lag. Though, they might be binded also by "server-side" things, so they are able to be lagged together or not at all.(Maybe?) Te clicker cannot be changed, this is the way webzen made it, i don't think i ve ever seen a server that was able to change something regarding this topic.

That's a good point tbh... didn't think about the downsides Ty anway.

Make it 70-80% of the time you need to pvp if you are going +5 , but i guess i am supposed to go just on NON-PVP invasion ^^. P.S. Maybe AE needs a lot of MLVL to be the best in hunting? (dunno, never tested) but i think that a char who is created by you to be the literal WORST in pvp, should be top 2 PVM/Hunter in every aspect of the game, or make him decent in PVP.

AE beat the DL in Golden? I guess it says "ADMIN" and i have to buy that... cause i've tested it myself, exactly dl vs elf, items and everything. 2 Persons, 5 rows of goldens, he beat me every time, on the golden. Around same items/sets and he beat me 5 out of 5. Nvm, the pvm buff it s well received, thank you sir. Elves have 300 useless energy points, and have to potentially waste 20 MLVLs due to maybe one day, having to play EEbuff at CS. I don't get it, you removed EE buf from live, but someone still needs to either "create an alt elf" or just waste 20MLVL on buffs if it's main like i am. I do not understand this at all. P.S. Sorry, but i really wanted to play AE but there elves number is so low

I'd like to propose something regarding character market which i think it will help a lot. When u put a character for sale, allow the buyer to get all the points up untill then. Give them a free reset/stats (no MLVL) because i think this will help the flow of character market to start. I heard a lot of people (even one of my friends) complain about buying a character that has f* up stats. And i think this will help the characters to sell easier. I'm trying to sell 1 char for 2 weeks (1rr) and can't manage to do so, and i also want to buy 1 (but i want specific stats xD) Maybe you will take it into consideration. Thank you and have a nice day!

+1

In my opinion is one of the worst in terms of leveling also. Everyone wants sm (manashield ) summ for weakness/dmg, rf for (everything) bk for dmg especially vulcanus, dl/emgs. I'm close to even not patying my own elf given the fact that she's so bad compared to what other characters have to offer. Ofc half of the elves left or changed to other chars. And also the MLVL in elf is stupid, if you ever need to go buff elf for cs, you either wont have MLVL buffs, or you will waste 20 points to skill them (which is a waste 90% of your time)

Deffence is decent, but the dmg is outrageously bad in both pvp and pvm.

First of all i'd like to say that i'm not really astonished by the leveling power of AE, which is disturbing, given that it should be a really good class at leveling. Second, i think the AE really lacks in PVP (and this server is having a 90% pvp aspect). Given that we do not have the Buff powers (not on live at least), we are just walking ice-arrow supports at best with dramatic low dmg 1 on 1. Tried using demons,dinorants, decent to good weapon, still not that good. I also tried different items,specs on testserver in a 1v1 situation and i did poorly vs almost every class. I guess she has a decent PVM, but i find DL/RF (maybe even EMG) to be better in golden-like situations and regarding holding spots is not room for question that she's MAYBE at the middle of the pack. So what do we exactly excel at? Cause not everyone is hard-coring castle-siege. At least, for me, this server is making it really hard to aspire to castle siege atm. Thank you all and have a good day!

Spawn, what i'm saying is that in terms of COMBO dmg, if u get strenght for weapons, adding more strenght (as bk is focused only on combo usage) is nonsense. You better add more agi and/or ene (for swell) because as of that formula, i understand that no matter what u do str/agi/ene they have a 1:1:1 ratio in terms of combo damage which i do not think is true as of this moment. EDIT: @Gion @ADMIN could u elucidate this for me?

Ye, i could get someones number, then trade him 10/10 times to show me his wings (then make a fake chat with someone) and if they ever chooses to show me their wings, and i have the good timings, i can make a story of him (or anyone else) selling me something for real $. I'm sure he wanted to sell for the money from the begining, but i also think that there is room for some abuse with this rule, and you should watch carefully to not be fooled by anyone, better not show your items in trade to people you do not know at all.

Formula: ((STR+ENE+AGI)/2)*2 First of all: this mathematic formula has no sense, why do you divide by 2 if u multiply the exact amount by 2? (it should be just str+ene+agi Second of all: That mathematic formula says that if u add str/or ene/or agi the combo damage should be raised the same no matter what u add str/ene/agi which does not happend (on test server at least) Any thoughts? Might my test dmg on test server be wrong and it is the same if u add str/ene/agi combodmgwise?

At least for me, the pk during pvp invasion, didn't work even once, got teleported to safezone all the time. I even got pked during non-pvp invasion once.

I don't think that is accurate. I had someone come at me today when the Golden was under 30-40% (didn't die) and i still lost the box to the other player. Is it possible that the math might not be working accurately?

I'd like to know the system of goldens from Aida/Kanturu. How are they working? I had several goldens all the way to 30-40% hp (and it takes me a LOOOOONG time) and at least on 4 occasions someone came and attacked the golden with me and took the box? I mean, it s ok i guess that i get killed on at least 2boxes/day but this is a bit much. I couldn't land a box+4 at all and i've found at least 30 goldens this week and last week. P.S. What does even the "most damage" mean? TOTAL dmg, or HIGHEST dmg dealt? The post about PVM is so ambiguous. 1. The HIGHEST dmg a party does, like combined 30k/hit 2. The highest dmg he does overall on the boss? (clearly not working, i lost a golden that i got to 20%) It's literally no catch-up mechanics on the goldens, if i cannot land even an invasion in 7 days xD

@Gion or @ADMIN So, me and my brother both play here, from the same house (sharing same connection/ip etc). Gladly you do not need an ee here and playing with an account each is decent(ish). The issue we encountered in the morning is that i entered BC2, and he entered BC1 (and we got kicked instantly from each BC). Someone told me we cannot join BC because we share the same ip/iconnection? That means we will never be able to even join the same BC or attempt a different BC the both of us? (i think this is a bit harsh, we are forced to forfeit the BC during EXP hour and lost already some chaoses and invitations) P.S. If this is stated somewhere in the rules, i didn t see, tried to find some information but failed. P.S.2. Someone said that i could use mobile hotspot ? Is that allowed?

Any informations regarding phoenix server?